|
The best captures
When you are looking for insights and knowledge the best captures are not
the ones with lots of "brightness and colors", whoever uses that
criteria is really very superficial and not really looking for information.
In this area where we had claimed that anomalies mimic normal looking
objects the best way to show that fact is actually documenting anomalies
transforming from something else to a balloon for example or in reverse
from a balloon to something else.
When people see that kind of transformations is very clear what is
happening, seeing only the end points of the transformations never is the
same as observing the transformations.
The same for clearly morphing anomalies as no mundane object exhibit shape
shifting.
For any object that looks like a balloon and behave like a balloon no
amount of argument can dispels the doubts about the object being a balloon,
that is why so many debunkers use that cheap shot all the time.
But when clear transformations are present debunkers are always mute as many
other people that continue to bring out the hardened mimics when there is
already plenty of documented observations showing transformations.
Observations showing transformations always provide more "information
content" and insights, people looking for knowledge should always seek
these ones.
|
No comments:
Post a Comment