- AI IA
- ALAN BUMAC
- BRAD MORRIS
- CAREFUL CONSIDERATION
- DAVID FEOLA
- ERIC ERASMO RENDON
- FAUSTO PEREZ
- FRANNY HUDSON
- JASON BALES
- JAY LEE
- JEFF McDUFFIE
- JEFFREY HARRISON
- JEREMY THOMAS
- JOHN GRAF
- LUPYLLO LEDEZMA
- MEMBERS YOUTUBE CHANNELS
- RICHARD GEORGE
- ROB FREEMAN
- RONALDO RICARDO
- SOME BRIEF CONSIDERATIONS
- ZAID HERNANDEZ
Some brief considerations about
Top of Form
Bottom of Form
Wednesday, December 14, 2016
Thursday, December 8, 2016
Description of the group Advanced Anomalies study group.
If you had not done personally atmospheric observations with high magnification equipment do not request to join this group, your request will be denied, your name, background, academic/job title is irrelevant here, only direct experience count.
This group is dedicated to the study of autonomous anomalous objects or sky critters as were named by Trevor J Constable, or simply Anomalies.
The main aim of this group is to advance the systematization of the knowledge about these real anomalous objects that have been video recorded all over the world, their reality is supported by an overwhelming amount of consistent observations.
Only people with known experience doing atmospheric observations with HIGH optical magnification cameras or telescopes in daylight or at night are allowed, infrared spotting is a big plus.
We only consider Second-Generation Data: Footage/pictures where structure details of the objects under consideration are given.
This group should be considered like a very "Advanced" ongoing graduate course in Anomalies studies and like any elective graduate course in any University it has "prerequisites" to be admitted.
UFO recycled and unconfirmed claims are not welcome here, only claims supported by consistent observational data. If you are a "UFO believer" this group is not for you. Preconceptions always imply a narrow minded outlook to reality.
Noise vs. Signal
For many people it is very hard to discern between "noise" and "signal", or in other words: between things with real information content and others that do not have information content.
This area of Anomalies Studies is full of examples showing that:
- Many people will "see" a craft in a glowing dot at night but are blind to anomalous manifestations in daylight with plenty of details.
- Many people will get lost thinking that a still picture present evidence of "interdimensional" objects/crafts and by doing that they are really killing the real cases of anomalous manifestations that they may have, these gems will be buried in a mountain of noise.
- Many people will believe personal accounts and many times gives these anecdotal accounts higher relevance than to hard evidence: noise vs. signal again.
Visiting any UFO site or channel online will provide an unlimited source of more examples, if you really pay attention you may find very few "signals" in there but these signals are usually buried in tons of noise, and as a rule the "noise" is a lot more "popular" than the "signals".